Ethics and Abortion Essay

Nicky was 18 when she started dating with James. They had unprotected premarital sex. After a few weeks, she found out that she was pregnant so she asked an advice from her doctor. She wasnt educate for a pander yet. She still had her ambitions in life and she didnt want to give up her social life. So she and James unyielding to abort the baby (Real Life Abortion (Nickys Story), 2003). Yes, you read it expert.In this time of one-night stands, premarital sex and unwanted pregnancies, abortion has become a common repeat from responsibility. Abortion is the removal of an embryo or a POC (Product of Conception) from the uterus. Basically, in that respect are two symbols of abortion the spontaneous abortion and the induced abortion. Spontaneous abortion is the type that is caused by accident and/or by natural cases. It can also be caused by environmental factors. On the other hand, induced abortion is caused by human fill.It is further categorized into therapeutic and elective. Th erapeutic abortion is the act of removing the fetus from the uterus for reasons of safety and/or survival in the part of the mother, to stay fresh the mothers health, to terminate pregnancy that would result in a child born with congenital disorders, and to selectively reduce the number of fetuses to lessen health risks regarding multiple pregnancies. Meanwhile, elective abortion is the kind of abortion performed for any other reason.There are two different but parallel theories regarding abortionthe eventful theory and the deontology theory. The consequential theory believes that an act is morally justifiedly if and only if it contributes to the common good(Williams, 1973. ). It outrightly supports abortionwhitethorn it be therapeutic or elective. In therapeutic abortion, if the mother life is at risk in having the pregnancy, then the consequential theory allows for much(prenominal) action. If having a baby destroys a persons proximo career, then abortion is okay.Consequential theory denies that moral rightness depends solely on the anything other than the consequences (B. Hooker, 2000). Nonetheless, what makes this morally wrong is not the abortion itself but the consequences it may bring to the mother such as emotional trauma. Consequential theory ignores all morally relevant factors to the consequences as opposed to whatever the circumstances there may be(Mill, 1861). However, deontology theory asserts otherwise.Deontological ethics or duty-based ethics does not consider an act as good or evil per se but classifies the action as it is being performed or on the process of performing devoid of prejudice or pre-established ethical formulas. It judges morality by evaluating the nature of the actions and the leave alone of the person involved rather than what is achieved(Kay, 1997). It is also known as nonconsequentialism. Deontological judgment depends on the object or original nature of the act. It typically involves two all-important(a) elements, pre rogatives and constraints.Prerogatives deny that one should always choose the option with optimistic consequences and constraints place limitations on the actions that the person may do in order to bring near his own personal good. Thus, from the deontological parlance, abortion, because it takes away life, upsets natures way of creation, and denies the natural capacity of a woman to give birth, is objectively and intentionally malicious, although it could be confirm in extreme cases which would merit for an exception.These two theories, in essence are different but somehow, they are compatible with each other. They do not very contradict each other, rather, they are analogous. Analogous theories are truly and essentially different but necessarily contradictory with each other in principle but they could have similar effects or conclusion per application that is why they are analogouspartly the same, partly different. In the present society, almost women view abortion consequent ially.They justify abortion by consequences it may cause. Lets take Nickys situation as an example. Nicky believes that the abortion of their baby is right mainly because it was not yet the right time for them to have a baby. If she were to continue with her pregnancy, what would have happened? She would have lived a miserable lifenot having a job or a career and tied down with a baby. What if her boyfriend James left her? Could she find another man who would readily acquit her despite her past?There were lots of things to be consideredschool, financial stability, and emotional stability. These and a lot more questions ran through Nickys mind before she decided to go with the abortion. Obviously, it is not easy to try to confuse ones conscience. But if we look at it closely, it is a matter of rights. Womens rights. Everybody makes luxates. Nicky did a mistake by engaging in unprotected sexual intercourse with her boyfriend. Nevertheless, continuing the pregnancy could also be a mi stake.Abortion, when we look at its consequences, is not a mistake. According to the Womens Rights, women have the right to bodily integrity and autonomy. Whether or not the woman decides to resort to abortion of the fetus inside her body, it is her right to decide on that. Aside from that, women also have the right to parenthood and marriage. Women who have committed abortion should not be discriminated by the society. True, it is not such a nice image but hey, women are humans. Women have rightsequal rightsand dignity(2006, Human Rights Watch).